Essay Tips – Pros and Cons of Direct Dictatorship

What Is a Direct Dictatorship?

There are various types of government. The type of system in power would differ in counting on the country. As for dictatorships, they’re a sort of autocracy where one ruler. And referred to as the dictator, bestowed with the ultimate power.

The type of dictatorship in control can also be of a different form depending on the time or era that referred to. In the past, many dictatorship governments put in place different types of power.

In some cases, they ruled without the consent of the people governed. Many countries broke faraway from this sort of state. It is generally deemed by many as unfavourable. The US, for example, formed based on freedom under democracy. Yet, before you write off all dictatorships as a lousy way to govern a country, it is essential to look into the pros and cons first.

Read More: College Essay About Biofuels Pros and Cons

Pros of Direct Dictatorship

Stability

Having one person to control all the decisions in a government can create a stable base where there’s no in-fighting among the officials, which may hinder progress. Also, a dictator would remain in power for an extended period. Unlike in other forms of government.

Especially democracy, where the people select new leaders. However, this may prevent a rustic from having problems associated with freedom. It would create a lack of continuity. But by keeping a single leader in power. Dictatorships can maintain its direction and focus.

Progress

While any government can always have effective laws and observe decisions, it can still commit mistakes and have flaws within the way it implements policies and handles issues.

Also, there will be challenges that it would face and cause delays, thus the need to resolve. This aspect is where dictatorships will play an enormous role since these governments can calibrate the legal framework without the need for a coalition to come up.

Read More: College Essay Tips – Credit Cards Pros and Cons for Students

With critical decisions and put in place laws, problems will be resolved as possible. With this technique, a dictator can concentrate more on his image and purposes of running a growing country. And since such a pacesetter doesn’t have special interests to guard. Unlike those who rule democratic governments. He or she will be more capable of modernizing the country.

Low Crime Rates

Generally, dictatorships put one person within the position to decide on what the laws are going to be. Also, have all the power needed to see that these regulations will be enforced. Also, these authorities usually carry severe punishments for even lesser violations. As a result, crime rates in dictatorial countries are meagre generally.

Efficiency

As only one person is making all the decisions, processes in the government will move forward. This is possible because there is no need for a group coming to an agreement, which takes more time. There will be no competitive body of power to veto any conclusion.

Read More: Essay Tips – Inspire Sleep Pros and Cons

And there will never be any backtracking to reach a compromise. When times get rough, this ability also will allow the govt. Allow to immediately put in place new plans and respond to new developments.

Economic Benefits

Dictatorship advocates say that elections are often very costly. Considering all the campaigns, propagandas, and other electoral processes. This is something that democracies need to shoulder, but not dictatorships. Proponents also say that the cash might be used on other essential projects, such as housing development and calamity recovery efforts.

Cons of Direct Dictatorship

Too Much Power

Giving ultimate power and control to one person is not ideal, as it can lead to future unrest and problems. A dictator can make decisions that will have an impact on the people in many ways. And the worse part is, the people do not consent to rule.

Also, dictatorships can lead to a poor distribution of wealth and a disunited society. It believed that placing unlimited power to the hands of one person is a recipe for disaster.

Abuse of Power

Opponents of dictatorships argue that dictators tend to enjoy power. And making them more self-serving and greedy. They say that these heads of state surrounded by security personnel, also, with armies that are complete with a massive armoury. That makes it easy for them to do as they please at the expense of the people.

Read More: College Essay Tips – Pros and Cons of Birth Control Pills

Inequality

History shows that dictators have been abusing power. And even if they did not intend to oppress the people. Human nature to have favourites and promote their interests would take over. Dictatorships have always led to inequality and unrest as those living under such a government have no recourse of action to address such issues.

Unsustainability

Dictatorships don’t last long, as there’s a high possibility. Where the people will try to overthrow the government at a certain point. As for the leaders, they never reach an end. Where they would turn to overpower, that means that they generally keep their position until they forced to do so.

And when a dictator dies, an influence vacuum would occur as people would struggle to claim his/her work to put in place. A different political system or for their own.

Mass Killings

Dictatorships are often known to accompanied by rising numbers of death. And also killings of the innocent. As you can see, people can go against the government. Which can lead to them considered enemies of the government and eliminated? Critics also mean that dictatorships instil fear among its people, as those who accused of rebellion punished and killed.

Read More: College Essay about Pros and Cons of Veganism

Many people view dictatorships as unfavourable. And those who see these forms of government as beneficial are often those who enjoy the power they have. But before you label dictatorships as detrimental. It is of utmost importance to take a look at both their pros and cons.

Conclusion

In final thoughts, Activists tend to maintain their loyalties to traditional parties. So, the post-dictatorship party system will look quite like the one that predated. But, when dictators opt to create a new party. Activist party loyalties tend to realign. Altering the party system that emerges after democratization.